CenturyLink..dead horse too? |
Post Reply
|
Page <1 23456 12> |
| Author | |
Don Watkins
Admin Group
Admin Joined: 14 Mar 2008 Posts: 22642 |
Quote Reply
Topic: CenturyLink..dead horse too?Posted: 19 Dec 2011 at 3:34pm |
|
How about a tracert to a site that's slow?
|
|
![]() |
|
Karl_db
Admin Group
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 29712 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2011 at 4:14pm |
|
I'll wait a while...till later...as it gets slower. (Watch it not tonight. LOL)
Then I think I'll shut it down, connect direct (wired) to the modem to the laptop and see how it compares. |
|
![]() |
|
Karl_db
Admin Group
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 29712 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2011 at 5:27pm |
|
This is what gets me and messes with my mind like a goldfish in a blender: I'm a "feel" type of guy. I don't check speeds as long as everything "feels" good (fast). It's only when it starts stuttering in the evening.
And...(the blender part)...the web sites don't "feel" unusually slow. Even youtube. It's only after clicking on a video and they start stuttering, stopping, re-buffering...plays for 5-10 seconds then pauses for a half-minute. Drives me nuts. (Or a download like that MS update.) Doesn't seem to matter what web site or what type. Just like something is putting an anchor out. |
|
![]() |
|
Karl_db
Admin Group
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 29712 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2011 at 6:02pm |
|
How does this play for ya?
http://townhall.com/video/cavuto-attacks-occupier-over-port-shutdown- Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7601] Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. C:\Users\Me>tracert townhall.com Tracing route to townhall.com [74.84.198.240] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.3.1 2 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.2.1 3 66 ms 68 ms 69 ms in-67-236-64-1.dhcp.embarqhsd.net [67.236.64.1] 4 76 ms 74 ms 74 ms 67.237.47.213 5 85 ms 85 ms 83 ms 208-110-248-225.lightcore.net [208.110.248.225] 6 86 ms 81 ms 79 ms cer-edge-17.inet.qwest.net [65.113.255.241] 7 84 ms 84 ms 91 ms chp-brdr-03.inet.qwest.net [67.14.8.194] 8 80 ms 74 ms 85 ms 63.146.27.18 9 93 ms 83 ms 82 ms vlan52.ebr2.Chicago2.Level3.net [4.69.138.190] 10 * 123 ms 126 ms ae-6-6.ebr2.Washington12.Level3.net [4.69.148.14 5] 11 125 ms 125 ms 118 ms ae-1-100.ebr1.Washington12.Level3.net [4.69.143. 213] 12 113 ms 117 ms 117 ms ae-8-8.ebr1.Washington1.Level3.net [4.69.143.217 ] 13 293 ms 198 ms 200 ms ae-7-7.car2.Richmond1.Level3.net [4.69.142.249] 14 185 ms 109 ms 195 ms PEAK-10.car2.Richmond1.Level3.net [4.26.66.6] 15 238 ms 204 ms 111 ms v13.rd1.ric.peak10.net [74.84.192.25] 16 131 ms 103 ms 104 ms 198-240.baymountain.com [74.84.198.240] Trace complete. |
|
![]() |
|
Karl_db
Admin Group
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 29712 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2011 at 6:05pm |
|
BTW: Constant buffering. Maybe play just a few seconds at a time. I'm getting ready to shutdown and connect direct wired (no router) just to test a rather massive download I'd started.
|
|
![]() |
|
Don Watkins
Admin Group
Admin Joined: 14 Mar 2008 Posts: 22642 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2011 at 6:24pm |
|
It's audio only, right? I'll have to check tomorrow when I'm back at the desktop but off the top it looks like they have a problem with their peering partner, those hops once you leave Chicago look kinda weak. I can find the link tomorrow but dslreports.com has an excellent tracert test (can't recall the exact name) that should help as well as it can easily identify bad hops.
|
|
![]() |
|
Karl_db
Admin Group
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 29712 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2011 at 6:25pm |
|
OK. Back online. I've rebooted the modem and the computer. Wireless is shut off and I'm connected, wired, directly to the modem.
Doesn't do squat to improve the video. Plays a few seconds, buffers, over and over. Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7601] Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. C:\Users\Me>tracert townhall.com Tracing route to townhall.com [74.84.198.240] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.2.1 2 68 ms 70 ms 70 ms in-67-236-64-1.dhcp.embarqhsd.net [67.236.64.1] 3 65 ms 66 ms 66 ms 67.237.47.213 4 78 ms 76 ms 112 ms 208-110-248-225.lightcore.net [208.110.248.225] 5 131 ms 84 ms 113 ms cer-edge-17.inet.qwest.net [65.113.255.241] 6 85 ms 83 ms 84 ms chp-brdr-03.inet.qwest.net [67.14.8.194] 7 85 ms 84 ms 85 ms 63.146.27.18 8 * 81 ms 84 ms vlan52.ebr2.Chicago2.Level3.net [4.69.138.190] 9 134 ms 137 ms 132 ms ae-6-6.ebr2.Washington12.Level3.net [4.69.148.14 5] 10 128 ms 129 ms 130 ms ae-1-100.ebr1.Washington12.Level3.net [4.69.143. 213] 11 131 ms 135 ms 138 ms ae-8-8.ebr1.Washington1.Level3.net [4.69.143.217 ] 12 105 ms * 103 ms ae-7-7.car2.Richmond1.Level3.net [4.69.142.249] 13 108 ms 103 ms 103 ms PEAK-10.car2.Richmond1.Level3.net [4.26.66.6] 14 105 ms 130 ms 106 ms v13.rd1.ric.peak10.net [74.84.192.25] 15 107 ms 104 ms 105 ms 198-240.baymountain.com [74.84.198.240] Trace complete. Time to try that massive download and see what happens. |
|
![]() |
|
Karl_db
Admin Group
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 29712 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2011 at 6:35pm |
|
As far as the download...it was one from Tech Republic. Over 300 MB...long enough for me to monitor download speed. I only let it download for maybe five or so minutes. Long enough to see that download speed bounces around between 80 and 140 Kb/s. Usually around 120 someplace. Wired or wireless. Doesn't make any stinking difference that I'm connected directly to the modem now. (Trying to confirm or eliminate the router effect.)
Tech Republic Backup Trial |
|
![]() |
|
Karl_db
Admin Group
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 29712 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2011 at 6:35pm |
|
Used to I kinda liked troubleshooting things. Now I just would appreciate it if it would work!!
|
|
![]() |
|
Don Watkins
Admin Group
Admin Joined: 14 Mar 2008 Posts: 22642 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2011 at 6:38pm |
|
I'm 99% sure it's not on your end, it starts bogging down after Chicago.
|
|
![]() |
|
Karl_db
Admin Group
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 29712 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2011 at 6:41pm |
|
Just for the heck of it...I tried IE instead of FF. Actually....IE is a little slower...never gets above 100 Kb/s.
I can't tracert the actual download...it's a third party site. Maybe I could tracert...but I'm not smart enough to figure out how to enter their url: http://usdownloads.quest.com.edgesuite.net/Repository/www.quest.com/latest_versions/Quest_vRangerBackupReplication_52122438.exe |
|
![]() |
|
Karl_db
Admin Group
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 29712 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2011 at 7:16pm |
|
Thanks. Just saw your post. I'm hyper. I'm pretty sure it's not me either. Just burns me. I tested at speedtest.centurylink.net
Actually....I tested every location. Ping varied but download and upload speeds...sheesh! Downloads between 2.8 and 3.2 MB. Upload speed from 444 to 610 Kbps. Life is good!! (Actually, in my paranoia I'm half-suspicious their speed test is rigged.) Now this is interesting: ![]() (Pingtest.net is part of speedtest.net. According to various tests, my "jitter" is usually a "C". http://pingtest.net/learn.php |
|
![]() |
|
Karl_db
Admin Group
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 29712 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2011 at 7:17pm |
|
Oh....I didn't realize that would post a pic here. I thought it was a link to their web site.
|
|
![]() |
|
Don Watkins
Admin Group
Admin Joined: 14 Mar 2008 Posts: 22642 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2011 at 7:24pm |
|
I just remembered that the name of the test at dlsreports is their latency test. It's gonna get you further than Chicago and it's gonna be worse than a c as it's after Chicago things get funky.
|
|
![]() |
|
Karl_db
Admin Group
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 29712 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2011 at 7:48pm |
|
And DSL reports gives me about 800 Kbps down from Chicago. Sigh.
BUT...I clicked on a link on their page for External Speedtest Sites. I tried one located here in Indiana. http://sd-pc.indiana.gigapop.net:7123/tcpbw100.html You might find that an informative page. Lots more than just down/up and speeddials. Hmm. I can't seem to copy the stats. Lots of info if you click on "statistics" and "more details" buttons. Here's part of the report. I had to type it since "copy" isn't working. Some of it may be in shorthand: ROFL The theoretical network limit is 0.57 Mbps. The NDT server has a 16384.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 1977.12 Mbps. Your PC/Workstation has a 63.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 3.82 Mbps. The Network based flow control limits the throughput to 1.95 Mbps. Download: 579 kb/s upload: 552 kb/s Information: Other network traffic is congesting the link Information(S2C): Packet queuing detected. |
|
![]() |
|
Don Watkins
Admin Group
Admin Joined: 14 Mar 2008 Posts: 22642 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2011 at 8:03pm |
|
I think "other network traffic" is the operative phrase. Their peering is funky.
|
|
![]() |
|
Karl_db
Admin Group
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 29712 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2011 at 8:19pm |
|
I wish I could copy the results from
http://sd-pc.indiana.gigapop.net:7123/tcpbw100.html More info than I can handle. I tried the test with IE. LOL Whatever Linux they use sees right past the public address that Centurylink puts out. (Although all it seems to detect is the address of my modem.) Anyhow...yep...I'm thinking that the technician I chatted with on the telephone is right: their wiring and hardware needs lots and lots of work. I got so flustered tonight I durn near threw my laptop through the window. Not on purpose. I stood up and started to walk away with the laptop in my hand. I forgot I was connected directly to the modem by wire. Oops. My almost bad. (I caught it. Whew!) |
|
![]() |
|
Karl_db
Admin Group
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 29712 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2011 at 8:20pm |
![]() |
|
Karl_db
Admin Group
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 29712 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2011 at 10:06pm |
|
Wow. Super headache. I browsed Comcast. Single options. Double plays. Triple plays. They remind me of the Dell site. Would you like to add the Howard Stern channel ($10.95 a month) or the Jewish Channel, or the (xxxxxxx channel). I bet you could add several hundred of dollars per month in "options". Just wow. (Lucky for me the dog wanted to go out and decided he was going to go for his nighttime walk...with or without me. We both went. He had more common sense than I.)
|
|
![]() |
|
Karl_db
Admin Group
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 29712 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 Dec 2011 at 10:27pm |
|
Effective Jan 2012:
Customers purchasing service at speeds of 1.5Mbps and below, have a usage limit of 150 Gigabytes (GB) of download volume per month. Customers purchasing service at speeds greater than 1.5Mbps, have a limit of 250GB in download volume per month. |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <1 23456 12> |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |